HYPER 212 EVO INSTALL FULL
There is also a slightly lower thermal signature in the adjacent regions at full speed, which indicates the added benefit of improved airflow.Ĭonsidering the low noise levels of the Hyper 212 Evo v2 even at full speed, having a quality fan curve which favors higher fan RPM is beneficial for any system installation.
HYPER 212 EVO INSTALL PRO
Our Flir One Pro thermal imaging camera shows some noticeable differences in heat soak throughout the cooling tower itself between 50% and 100%, which is to be expected. Omitting AVX instruction sets allows for accurate, 100% loads at chosen clock speeds, while allowing AVX instructions would provide higher, albeit, unrealistic synthetic CPU loads and excessive heat production, less indicative of real-world use. Prime95 v29.4b8 (no AVX) is used for two-hour intervals, one managing fans at 50% PWM and the other at 100% PWM with RPM measurements being taken every three seconds and averaged across the duration of each two-hour capture. 7C70v12)Ĭorsair Dominator Platinum RGB, 16GB (2x8GB) DDR4-3600ĬrystalFontz CFA-633-TMI-KU, 4x Dallas One Wire WR-DOW-Y17 sensorsĬorsair Commander Pro, 100%/50% PWM Speed profiles (liquid cooling pump always if applicable)ĭata comparisons are based on data collected from testing performed on our new Intel i9-10850K system, including re-visiting many previously covered products which were originally covered on the prior testing platform which pivoted around an i7-5930k (4.20ghz Cooler Master Hyper 212 EVO V2 at Amazon for $39.99 I think that the majority of people don't care how heavy their cooler is, only about the price.Intel Core i9-10850K LGA1200 (Comet Lake), all 10 cores 4.6Ghz 1.190v, (3.60Ghz stock speed, single core boost 5.2Ghz) You would also need to use the ambient temperature delta rather than the absolute temperature in any sort of ratio for the results to be meaningful. And a dead CPU.Īlso, the higher the temperature (Bad), the lower the ratio, which doesn't make sense. Other charts count as well when making a final decision.īy that logic, having no cooler at all is the most efficient. Panteck PH-TC14PE weighs 970g without fans, performing at 46c.970g/46c= 21.09 efficiency ratio.CM Hyper 212 EVO Weighs 580g with fan, performing at 51c.580g/51c= 11.37 efficiency ratio.Ideally, the lower the ratio, the more efficient a cpu cooler is. To heatsink manufactures: Do something innovating if a wall seems to be in the way! Just look at PSU manufactures, they are reaching 92% Platinum rating, from 82% rating four years ago.Example: Noctua NH-D14 weighs 900g without fans and it did 45c at full load. Not just slab more metal to defeat the other guy.
![hyper 212 evo install hyper 212 evo install](https://delightlylinux.files.wordpress.com/2017/03/cooler02.jpg)
Could you guys do a heatsink Weight/cooling efficiency chart? This is to make readers see which manufacture did its engineering mission to make a much more effective unit than its competition. It is nice that new cpu heatsinks are becoming better in performance, but i don't like the fact that they are becoming bigger and heavier than previous cpu heatsink kings by only earning a degree or two above the rest. I remembered that in a few months later Noctua took the crown as top performing air cooled heatsink. Other charts count as well when making a final decision.īunnywannyI been using a Prolimatech Megahalems since its introduction back in 2009. Ideally, the lower the ratio, the more efficient a cpu cooler is. Panteck PH-TC14PE weighs 970g without fans, performing at 46c.ĬM Hyper 212 EVO Weighs 580g with fan, performing at 51c. Noctua NH-D14 weighs 900g without fans and it did 45c at full load. To heatsink manufactures: Do something innovating if a wall seems to be in the way! Just look at PSU manufactures, they are reaching 92% Platinum rating, from 82% rating four years ago.
![hyper 212 evo install hyper 212 evo install](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/EBDgcl1RNek/maxresdefault.jpg)
I been using a Prolimatech Megahalems since its introduction back in 2009.